From: chuck.lever@oracle.com (Chuck Lever)
Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH] nfs: add support for splice writes
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:48:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1CCD753F-86BC-4C8D-96CC-FD3B67370B1F@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240335302.5390.20.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
On Apr 21, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 10:48 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:17:23PM +0530, Suresh Jayaraman wrote:
>>> +static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
>>> + struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
>>> + size_t count, unsigned int flags)
>>> +{
>>> + struct dentry *dentry = filp->f_path.dentry;
>>> +
>>> + dprintk("NFS splice_write(%s/%s, %lu@%Lu)\n",
>>> + dentry->d_parent->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.name,
>>> + (unsigned long) count, (unsigned long long) *ppos);
>>> +
>>> + return generic_file_splice_write(pipe, filp, ppos, count, flags);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>> You need all calls from nfs_file_write, too:
>>
>> - most importantly the nfs_revalidate_file_size for O_APPEND
>
> Isn't O_APPEND illegal for splice_write()? It looks like it is from a
> quick perusal of do_splice_from().
>
>> - the nfs_do_fsync for sync writes
>
> generic_file_splice_write() calls generic_osync_inode(), which should
> ensure sync writes even with NFS.
> The one thing it won't do is propagate NFS write errors back to the
> caller. If we do care about this, then we should certainly test for
> nfs_need_sync_write() and then call nfs_do_fsync() (see
> nfs_file_write()).
>
>> - probably the stats increment
>
> We should talk to Chuck about this.
I don't know much about the characteristics of splice writes, so you
can do one of two things:
1. Create a separate BYTESWRITTEN counter for these
2. Lump them into NORMALBYTESWRITTEN if these are effectively cached
writes.
--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-21 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-02 6:21 Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-02 6:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-02 6:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-02 6:42 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-02 12:42 ` Masahiro Tamori
2009-04-20 5:39 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-20 12:23 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-04-20 12:38 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-20 14:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-04-20 15:47 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-21 14:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-21 17:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-04-21 18:48 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2009-04-22 8:33 ` Suresh Jayaraman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1CCD753F-86BC-4C8D-96CC-FD3B67370B1F@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox