[ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Fix missing data pointer

[david.goulet@polymtl.ca (David Goulet)]

This applies to tracepoint using a marker (trace_mark_tp)

At commit 9dec086e052cf7f583a3afaa3aab48a6de8d38ac,
the tracepoint_probe_register/unregister_noupdate function has been
changed with the addition of a void data pointer. In set_marker(),
the call to that function was not updated with this new parameter.
The effect was that on a second register_trace with an already
registered probe, the data ptr was corrupted with false data and
thus the probe checking failed to validate duplicates. So, the same
data was reproduced for a single trace call. Same behavior for
unregistering the marker, it was not found.

NOTE : For now, this pointer is NULL because we don't have at this
point tracing session.

Signed-off-by: David Goulet <david.goulet at polymtl.ca>
---
 libust/marker.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libust/marker.c b/libust/marker.c
index 0c85cc3..cb8ffc1 100644
--- a/libust/marker.c
+++ b/libust/marker.c
@@ -594,11 +594,11 @@ static int set_marker(struct marker_entry *entry, struct marker *elem,
 //ust//			BUG_ON(!ret);
 			ret = tracepoint_probe_register_noupdate(
 				elem->tp_name,
-				elem->tp_cb);
+				elem->tp_cb, NULL);
 		} else {
 			ret = tracepoint_probe_unregister_noupdate(
 				elem->tp_name,
-				elem->tp_cb);
+				elem->tp_cb, NULL);
 			/*
 			 * tracepoint_probe_update_all() must be called
 			 * before the module containing tp_cb is unloaded.
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ static void disable_marker(struct marker *elem)
 		 * checking has been done in the __trace_mark_tp() macro.
 		 */
 		ret = tracepoint_probe_unregister_noupdate(elem->tp_name,
-			elem->tp_cb);
+			elem->tp_cb, NULL);
 		WARN_ON(ret);
 		/*
 		 * tracepoint_probe_update_all() must be called
-- 
1.7.3