From: cgd@broadcom.com
To: bje@redhat.com
Cc: "Andrew Cagney" <ac131313@cygnus.com>,
"Nick Clifton" <nickc@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Cagney" <ac131313@redhat.com>,
"Geoff Keating" <geoffk@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [maint] sim and common
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 11:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yov5g024px2q.fsf@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: bje@redhat.com's message of "Tue, 9 Apr 2002 12:58:02 +0000 (UTC)"
At Tue, 9 Apr 2002 12:58:02 +0000 (UTC), "Ben Elliston" wrote:
> >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
>
> >> Why do you feel it would be helpful? I don't think there has been any
> >> evidence that patch approvals for sim/common has been a bottleneck or
> >> indeed even a problem for anyone to date.
>
> Andrew> Is it unhelpful? The people with the best idea for what to do with the
> Andrew> common framework are most likely going to be those that are actively
> Andrew> developing simulators. Right now that is CGD (Chris D).
>
> While I agree with this point, I also like the idea of having a
> devil's advocate to approve sim/common patches. In the heat of the
> moment, it's easy to think of patches to sim/common to solve
> port-specific problems that are not in the best interest of all
> simulators.
For what it's worth, I agree with Ben here. 8-)
I'd _prefer_ to have others review my changes (as long i can get that
review in a timely fashion)...
chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-09 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-05 21:08 Andrew Cagney
2002-03-05 21:37 ` cgd
2002-03-07 15:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-23 13:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-25 7:12 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-03-25 9:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-25 10:22 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
[not found] ` <mailpost.1017080577.5428@news-sj1-1>
2002-03-25 10:32 ` cgd
2002-03-25 10:49 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-03-25 10:51 ` cgd
2002-03-25 10:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-12 9:31 ` Nick Clifton
2002-04-08 7:32 ` Ben Elliston
2002-04-08 9:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-09 5:57 ` Ben Elliston
[not found] ` <mailpost.1018357082.12343@news-sj1-1>
2002-04-09 11:05 ` cgd [this message]
2002-04-09 11:22 ` Ben Elliston
2002-04-09 12:32 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yov5g024px2q.fsf@broadcom.com \
--to=cgd@broadcom.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=bje@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=geoffk@redhat.com \
--cc=nickc@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox