From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
Cc: cgd@broadcom.com, Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>,
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>,
Geoff Keating <geoffk@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [maint] sim and common
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 12:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CB341B9.8050609@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15539.12623.535923.366462@toenail.toronto.redhat.com>
> "cgd" == cgd <cgd@broadcom.com> writes:
>
>
>>> While I agree with this point, I also like the idea of having a
> >> devil's advocate to approve sim/common patches. In the heat of the
> >> moment, it's easy to think of patches to sim/common to solve
> >> port-specific problems that are not in the best interest of all
> >> simulators.
>
> cgd> For what it's worth, I agree with Ben here. 8-)
>
> cgd> I'd _prefer_ to have others review my changes (as long i can
> cgd> get that review in a timely fashion)...
>
> Agreed--and as I stated, I don't believe there is any evidence to
> suggest that timeliness is an issue at this point.
In addition to reviewing patches, a maintainer is typically assumed to
be ``maintaining'' the existing code: fixing bugs, rewriting design
mistakes, adding new features, ....
enjoy,
Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-09 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-05 21:08 Andrew Cagney
2002-03-05 21:37 ` cgd
2002-03-07 15:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-23 13:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-25 7:12 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-03-25 9:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-25 10:22 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
[not found] ` <mailpost.1017080577.5428@news-sj1-1>
2002-03-25 10:32 ` cgd
2002-03-25 10:49 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-03-25 10:51 ` cgd
2002-03-25 10:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-12 9:31 ` Nick Clifton
2002-04-08 7:32 ` Ben Elliston
2002-04-08 9:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-09 5:57 ` Ben Elliston
[not found] ` <mailpost.1018357082.12343@news-sj1-1>
2002-04-09 11:05 ` cgd
2002-04-09 11:22 ` Ben Elliston
2002-04-09 12:32 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CB341B9.8050609@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=bje@redhat.com \
--cc=cgd@broadcom.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=geoffk@redhat.com \
--cc=nickc@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox