From: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Obsoleting Solaris 10 support
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 12:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yddzhvcg3bh.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016163907.GF17534@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:39:07 -0700")
Hi Joel,
>> this would argue for an obsoletion in the GDB 8.4 timeframe, roughly at
>> the same time GCC itself does. Issues I'm facing with Solaris 10 right
>> now (apart from the S10-only build breakages) are having to deal with
>> different syscall numbers while working on an xml syscall table for
>> Solaris and catch syscall support, as well as differences in corefile
>> contents. I suspect there will be more as time goes on.
>
> Sound good. Feel free to step in and make suggestions if you have
> new info that makes you think we should stop support earlier.
I guess 8.4 should be fine. I've just checked the last couple of
releases which suggest that 8.3 will be ready sometime next spring,
close to the gcc 9 release. In that case, obsoletion/removal in gdb 8.4
is just fine. Initially I'd misremembered that gdb followed a procedure
similar to gcc (obsoletion in one release, removal in the next), but the
two being almost one step isn't a problem either.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-17 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-16 9:42 Rainer Orth
2018-10-16 14:20 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-10-16 14:31 ` Rainer Orth
2018-10-16 16:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-10-16 18:21 ` Dennis Clarke
2018-10-17 12:39 ` Rainer Orth
2018-10-17 12:34 ` Rainer Orth [this message]
2018-10-16 18:41 ` Dennis Clarke
2018-10-17 12:42 ` Rainer Orth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yddzhvcg3bh.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE \
--to=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox