From: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Obsoleting Solaris 10 support
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 12:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yddva60g31r.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10821a81-f740-ca9f-2606-b6ae88988eee@blastwave.org> (Dennis Clarke's message of "Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:21:13 -0400")
Hi Dennis,
> On 10/16/2018 12:39 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>>> this would argue for an obsoletion in the GDB 8.4 timeframe, roughly at
>>> the same time GCC itself does. Issues I'm facing with Solaris 10 right
>>> now (apart from the S10-only build breakages) are having to deal with
>>> different syscall numbers while working on an xml syscall table for
>>> Solaris and catch syscall support, as well as differences in corefile
>>> contents. I suspect there will be more as time goes on.
>>
>> Sound good. Feel free to step in and make suggestions if you have
>> new info that makes you think we should stop support earlier.
>>
>
> I can not think of a valid compelling reason to make the effort. I have
> had no major problems getting gcc bootstrapped on ye old s10 but I use
> dbx from the Sun/Oracle Studio line for debug work. If at all.
indeed: while gdb works reasonably well on Solaris, I had a couple of
cases (often related to corrupted stacks) where dbx dealt with the issue
way better (or even at all) compared to gdb which could be thrown off-track.
> Given that Oracle has dropped Solaris 10 into a legacy support status
> there isn't any valid reason for extra efforts to get gdb working
> flawlessly. At least I can not think of any. Sadly.
I hope to get a few fixes into gdb for the 8.3 release that would
benefit both Solaris 10 and 11, but after that, I'm done with S10.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-17 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-16 9:42 Rainer Orth
2018-10-16 14:20 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-10-16 14:31 ` Rainer Orth
2018-10-16 16:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-10-16 18:21 ` Dennis Clarke
2018-10-17 12:39 ` Rainer Orth [this message]
2018-10-17 12:34 ` Rainer Orth
2018-10-16 18:41 ` Dennis Clarke
2018-10-17 12:42 ` Rainer Orth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yddva60g31r.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE \
--to=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de \
--cc=dclarke@blastwave.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox