From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
Cc: drow@false.org, ghost@cs.msu.su, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI: reporting of multiple breakpoints
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <upslkgamz.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17398.18077.716159.385642@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (message from Paul Koning on Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:56:45 -0500)
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:56:45 -0500
> From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
> Cc: eliz@gnu.org, ghost@cs.msu.su, gdb@sources.redhat.com
>
> However, the fact that some architectures have imprecise watchpoints
> is no reason to force imprecision on those that can do better.
What do you mean by ``do better''? Should we back up PC to the
instruction that triggered the watchpoint? If we do, then when we
continue, the watchpoint will trigger again and again, ad nauseam.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-18 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-17 15:32 Vladimir Prus
2006-02-17 15:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-17 16:04 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-02-17 18:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-17 19:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-17 19:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-17 19:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-17 19:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-17 20:06 ` Paul Koning
2006-02-17 20:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-17 20:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-17 20:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-17 20:18 ` Paul Koning
2006-02-17 20:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-17 21:37 ` Paul Koning
2006-02-17 21:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-17 21:56 ` Paul Koning
2006-02-17 22:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-18 9:54 ` Paul Koning
2006-02-18 10:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-18 15:47 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2006-02-18 15:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-18 17:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-18 17:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-18 17:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-18 18:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-19 18:20 ` Paul Koning
2006-02-19 18:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-19 18:44 ` Robert Dewar
2006-02-20 3:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-18 11:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-19 18:19 ` Paul Koning
2006-02-19 18:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-19 18:54 ` Paul Koning
2006-02-19 19:05 ` Robert Dewar
2006-02-19 19:30 ` Paul Koning
2006-02-19 19:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-19 19:57 ` Paul Koning
2006-02-19 21:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-20 4:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-20 7:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-20 18:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-17 20:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-17 20:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-17 20:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-17 20:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-17 20:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-17 20:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-17 20:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-17 20:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-17 19:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=upslkgamz.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
--cc=pkoning@equallogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox