Re: MI: reporting of multiple breakpoints

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:24:19 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
> > No, I think we were stopped by both of them.  They both watch the same
> > address, so they both fired when the location gets written.
> 
> If they were set using the same watchpoint register, they "both"
> triggered trivially.  If they were set using different hardware
> watchpoint resources, then the target almost certainly reported only
> one of them.

But, as you well know, GDB will think that both were reported, due to
the way we currently find out which watchpoint triggered.

> > But what about the commands associated with that breakpoint?  We've
> > reached the address and stopped, allright, but we didn't run the
> > commands the user wanted us to, did we?
> 
> We should run them when we stop.  That's what I'm trying to say :-)

Do we run them now?  If not, I think we agree that we should fix that.