Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>, Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI: changing breakpoint location
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <u1wx1paed.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060316231215.GA25222@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:12:15 -0500)

> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:12:15 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 12:07:27PM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote:
> >  > Now, I have to delete the old breakpoint and create the new one, which is
> >  > workable, but not convenient.
> > 
> > I don't find a problem with that, but it would be nice if when a program is
> > edited and recompiled that GDB could track the line number.  So, for example
> > if the breakpoint is on line 10, say, and lines 4 and 5 are deleted, then
> > after recompiling and restarting, its on line 8.  I think Visual Stuio has
> > this feature.  I have no idea how easy/hard it would be to implement.
> 
> Hard.  RMS once asked for a simpler version of this, which is to track
> breakpoints by line number relative to the start of the function; but
> really we ought to be able to do this very well.

If we have a volunteer, the fact that it's hard is not very relevant ;-)

> I'm thinking something like "remember a couple lines of context, if you
> can find the same context, adjust the breakpoint and warn the user". 
> But there's some risk of it landing in the wrong place; I don't know
> how to do it reliably but I bet a motivated developer would come up
> with something :-)

At least the front end could help here, since this happens when
sources are edited.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-17 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-16 15:43 Vladimir Prus
2006-03-16 15:48 ` Bob Rossi
2006-03-16 16:05   ` Vladimir Prus
2006-03-16 16:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-16 16:16   ` Vladimir Prus
2006-03-16 16:40     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-16 16:46       ` Vladimir Prus
2006-03-16 17:11         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-17 10:46           ` Vladimir Prus
2006-03-17 18:28             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-17 17:43               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-17 11:03       ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-17 10:57   ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-16 23:12 ` Nick Roberts
2006-03-16 23:23   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-16 23:25     ` David Daney
2006-03-16 23:54       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-17 13:20         ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-17 17:34           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-18 18:46             ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-16 23:56       ` Nick Roberts
2006-03-17 10:55     ` Vladimir Prus
2006-03-17 11:42     ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2006-03-17  0:04   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-17  0:23     ` Joel Brobecker
2006-03-17  3:57       ` Jim Ingham
2006-03-17 11:40   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=u1wx1paed.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
    --cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox