Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>,
	Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>,
		gdb@sources.redhat.com, Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Subject: Re: MI: changing breakpoint location
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060317172254.GB15128@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uzmjpnvpl.fsf@gnu.org>

On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 01:42:46PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 03:23:09PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> > > I can't see why you would want to do it anyplace *other* than the 
> > > editor.  It would know for sure which lines had been added and deleted. 
> > >  Anything else would just be guessing.
> > 
> > Well, in the CLI GDB, we don't have any interaction with the editor. 
> 
> But we can ask the CLI users to type the line difference, can we?  I
> don't expect this command to be used too frequently from the command
> line, so it doesn't seem to harsh a limitation.

Would that be useful?

Here's how I envision this command being useful: the context-sensitive
analysis I described earlier.  Heuristics (i.e. guesses) as to what's
happened to the file, while GDB's back was turned.  The user's rarely
going to know "oh, that breakpoint moved twenty lines".

The alternative command, "oh, that breakpoint should be over here now",
is a lot simpler for a CLI user to use.  Maybe it's still useful?  I
didn't think so originally, but I'm being persuaded.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-17 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-16 15:43 Vladimir Prus
2006-03-16 15:48 ` Bob Rossi
2006-03-16 16:05   ` Vladimir Prus
2006-03-16 16:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-16 16:16   ` Vladimir Prus
2006-03-16 16:40     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-16 16:46       ` Vladimir Prus
2006-03-16 17:11         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-17 10:46           ` Vladimir Prus
2006-03-17 18:28             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-17 17:43               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-17 11:03       ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-17 10:57   ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-16 23:12 ` Nick Roberts
2006-03-16 23:23   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-16 23:25     ` David Daney
2006-03-16 23:54       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-17 13:20         ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-17 17:34           ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-03-18 18:46             ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-16 23:56       ` Nick Roberts
2006-03-17 10:55     ` Vladimir Prus
2006-03-17 11:42     ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-17  0:04   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-17  0:23     ` Joel Brobecker
2006-03-17  3:57       ` Jim Ingham
2006-03-17 11:40   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060317172254.GB15128@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=ddaney@avtrex.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
    --cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox