From: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: how canonical are template names?
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ro1ptr4d3ru.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030110215513.GA9252@nevyn.them.org>
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:55:13 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:42:07PM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
>> Any opinions as to which of these should be considered serious, if
>> any? I'm leaning towards not worrying about any of them, but
>> filing a low-priority PR about it just to get it into the database.
>> (The main reason for the latter is because it would be nice if
>> input were a bit more flexible; I don't care so much about
>> variations in GDB's output.)
> I put a generally low priority on template debugging right now, so I'm
> OK with this. Somewhere along the line we'll need to do better.
All right, then I won't worry about it too much for now.
Which makes me happy: at least in the DWARF-2 case, I think I'm
finally producing all the symbols I want. And lookup_symbol (and its
new friend, lookup_symbol_namespace) behave correctly. And blocks
know about namespace scope. Probably some other happy things are
happening, too.
So, unless I'm going crazy, the only remaining important item on my To
Do list is the other symbol-accessing functions. Who knows; maybe
I'll have some RFC's/RFA's for you and Elena by the end of the month.
It would be nice...
David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-10 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-10 21:42 David Carlton
2003-01-10 21:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-10 22:44 ` David Carlton [this message]
2003-01-10 23:34 ` Stan Shebs
2003-01-10 23:47 ` David Carlton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-11 1:07 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-11 3:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-11 0:59 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-10 21:19 David Carlton
2003-01-10 21:21 ` David Carlton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ro1ptr4d3ru.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU \
--to=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox