Re: obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface

[David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>]

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:41:51 -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net> said:

> gdb.c++/annota2.exp reports two KFAIL's which are unrelated to
> annotation.  One KFAIL is about a hardware watchpoint that triggers on
> the first instruction after resuming a breakpoint.  The other is about
> sending a ^C and then immediately reading from gdb (I suspect there is a
> race condition here but I'm not sure).  Actually it would be good to
> move those tests to a different test script right now, because it's such
> a pain to work with an annotation-enabled test script.

Yeah: it's silly to have bugs that only occur in gdb.c++/annota2.exp
and that have nothing to do with C++ or with annotation.  (I don't
want to delete them from that file until the whole file is gone, but I
do want to reproduce the bugs in other files.)  I think I have a patch
around to reproduce the watchpoint bug in gdb.base/watchpoint.exp;
I'll polish that off and submit it.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu