Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E2ECA8B.6070601@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200301211741.h0LHfp308677@duracef.shout.net>

> Jim Blandy writes:
> 
>> If folks agree that annotate level 2 should go, we could:
>> - announce that annotate level 2 will be disabled in the release after
>>   next;
>> - in that release, disable the code, but leave it there, to see if
>>   anyone complains, and whether they can be persuaded to switch to MI;
>>   and
>> - in the release after that, if all goes well, remove the code to
>>   support annotation level 2.
> 
> 
> According to the NEWS file in gdb 5.1, the annotation interface
> is deprecated.  So I say, go for it!

I don't think that is sufficient - making something deprecated only 
tells the user that they should not use it in new development.  Not that 
they must rewrite existing code to not use it.  To do that we'd have to 
obsolete it.  (Asside, this is the same as for code - deprecating a 
function only stops it being used in new code.)

I think something needs to be done to the next release that `rubs the 
users nose in it'.

Andrew



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-01-22 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-21 17:41 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-21 20:25 ` David Carlton
2003-01-22 16:45 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-04  1:45 Mike Mueller
2003-02-04  6:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-21 20:40 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
     [not found] <1043140716.4941.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2003-01-21 19:03 ` Jim Ingham
2003-01-21 18:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-22  7:56 ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-21  7:38 Jim Blandy
2003-01-21 16:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-21 16:54 ` David Carlton
2003-01-21 19:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-22  8:37 ` Pierre Muller
2003-01-22 15:06   ` Elena Zannoni
     [not found] ` <15917.39229.935851.920452@nick.uklinux.net>
2003-01-28 20:51   ` Jim Blandy
2003-01-29  1:41     ` Nick Roberts
2003-01-29  5:37       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29  5:40       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 21:58         ` Jim Blandy
2003-01-29 22:00           ` Arnaud Charlet
2003-01-29 22:50           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 21:52       ` Jim Blandy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E2ECA8B.6070601@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jimb@redhat.com \
    --cc=mec@shout.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox