Re: C++ FAIL counts and the effect of demangler fix

[Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>]

Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:

> As far as I know, GDB works tolerably well now for 3.0 - it doesn't dump
> core for instance :-).  I'm just geting in and being clear to people
> that think 3.0 C++ support perfect needs to be perfect for 5.1 :-)
> 
> One likely reality is that: GDB 5.1 will come out, GCC 3.0 will come out
> and then a GDB 5.2 will appear.

That seems ok.  I don't think we should hold up 5.1 for "perfect"
3.0 C++ support - in fact it is better, I think, for 5.1 to come
out before Gcc 3.0, as long as it has at least tolerable 3.0 C++
support.

I could list my version of a priority list of C++ features, but
since I'm unlikely to do anything about it, there;s not point.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/~per/