* MI equivalent for "whatis"
@ 2006-01-26 16:38 Vladimir Prus
2006-01-26 17:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Prus @ 2006-01-26 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
Is there any MI command that does the same as "whatis".
The "-symbol-type" is not implemented and to use `-var-info-type' I need to
use "variable-objects", which is too much of refactoring.
- Volodya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: MI equivalent for "whatis"
2006-01-26 16:38 MI equivalent for "whatis" Vladimir Prus
@ 2006-01-26 17:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-27 16:11 ` Vladimir Prus
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2006-01-26 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 07:21:47PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>
> Is there any MI command that does the same as "whatis".
What you see in the manual is what you get :-)
> The "-symbol-type" is not implemented and to use `-var-info-type' I need to
> use "variable-objects", which is too much of refactoring.
I assume you mean -symbol-list-types. Someone could implement that.
But varobj really is the way to go and it wouldn't be hard to do a
special-case of that:
-var-create OBJ * <symbolname>
-var-info-type OBJ
-var-delete OBJ
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: MI equivalent for "whatis"
2006-01-26 17:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2006-01-27 16:11 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-01-27 16:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Prus @ 2006-01-27 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 07:21:47PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>
>> Is there any MI command that does the same as "whatis".
>
> What you see in the manual is what you get :-)
>
>> The "-symbol-type" is not implemented and to use `-var-info-type' I need
>> to use "variable-objects", which is too much of refactoring.
>
> I assume you mean -symbol-list-types.
No, exactly "-symbol-type" which is documented as equivalent to "ptype".
> Someone could implement that.
> But varobj really is the way to go and it wouldn't be hard to do a
> special-case of that:
>
> -var-create OBJ * <symbolname>
> -var-info-type OBJ
> -var-delete OBJ
Thanks, that worked.
- Volodya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: MI equivalent for "whatis"
2006-01-27 16:11 ` Vladimir Prus
@ 2006-01-27 16:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2006-01-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 06:49:26PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> No, exactly "-symbol-type" which is documented as equivalent to "ptype".
Oh right - I completely misread the manual...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-27 16:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-26 16:38 MI equivalent for "whatis" Vladimir Prus
2006-01-26 17:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-27 16:11 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-01-27 16:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox