Re: Increasing backtrace entries

[JobHunts02@aol.com]

In a message dated 6/26/2008 11:27:23 AM Pacific  Daylight Time, 
msnyder@specifix.com writes:
> > > warning: exec file  is newer than core file.
> > > Cannot access memory at  address  0x6d61706c
> > > (gdb) bt
> > > #0  0x1003cc60 in  wsrFind  (
> > > reg_p=0x30284d9e <Address 0x30284d9e out  of  bounds>, rxc=-1)
> > > at lwc.c:4024
> > >  Cannot access memory  at address 0x30284d84
> > > (gdb)
>  > 
> > Apparently the core file does not match the executable and/or  debugging
> > info you have.  If that is the case then  nothing can be done about that,
> > except by manually decoding the  frames.
>
> Yes, the appearance is that either (a) you have  recompiled
> the executable since the corefile was generated, or (b)  it's
> the wrong executable, in which case finding the right one
>  will solve your problem.  


I can assure you:
 
(a) The executable was not recompiled after the corefile was generated.  and
(b) The executable is the same one that lead to the generation of the  
corefile.
 
Any other explanations?  I am running Linux 2.6.10 on PowerPC.and was  using 
gdb 6.8.  I have seen the same behavior using older versions of gdb  too.



**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for 
fuel-efficient used cars.      (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)