From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32393 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2008 06:05:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 32383 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jun 2008 06:05:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from imo-m13.mx.aol.com (HELO imo-m13.mail.aol.com) (64.12.143.101) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 06:04:53 +0000 Received: from JobHunts02@aol.com by imo-m13.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.4.) id o.bd4.34247d07 (32913) for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:04:45 -0400 (EDT) From: JobHunts02@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 06:05:00 -0000 Subject: Re: Increasing backtrace entries To: gdb@sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5044 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2 In a message dated 6/26/2008 11:27:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time, msnyder@specifix.com writes: > > > warning: exec file is newer than core file. > > > Cannot access memory at address 0x6d61706c > > > (gdb) bt > > > #0 0x1003cc60 in wsrFind ( > > > reg_p=0x30284d9e
, rxc=-1) > > > at lwc.c:4024 > > > Cannot access memory at address 0x30284d84 > > > (gdb) > > > > Apparently the core file does not match the executable and/or debugging > > info you have. If that is the case then nothing can be done about that, > > except by manually decoding the frames. > > Yes, the appearance is that either (a) you have recompiled > the executable since the corefile was generated, or (b) it's > the wrong executable, in which case finding the right one > will solve your problem. I can assure you: (a) The executable was not recompiled after the corefile was generated. and (b) The executable is the same one that lead to the generation of the corefile. Any other explanations? I am running Linux 2.6.10 on PowerPC.and was using gdb 6.8. I have seen the same behavior using older versions of gdb too. **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)