Re: [MI] -break-insert: (a)synchronous?

[Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> This means another MI version bump (currently it is on 1).  See how mi0
> vs mi1 was handled (especially in the testsuite).

I'll take care of it. Unless I hear otherwise, I will modify the code to
support old and new. Are we going to set a date or time limit on
deprecating the old mis?

> BTW, there is another necessary interface change lurking in the wings -
> frames need to be changed to lists (dump of frame_id) instead of single
> values - so the version bump is likely a good idea.

Yes, indeed. I guess it's a good time to make drastic changes? ;-)

> How to do it?
>
> I guess prototype the changes with -i=mi2 and then when ready do the
> testsuite suffle for the test cases that are effected.

Will do.

Thanks for the note.
Keith