From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8986 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2002 17:49:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8979 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2002 17:49:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2002 17:49:55 -0000 Received: from makita.cygnus.com (makita.sfbay.redhat.com [192.168.30.83]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA06259 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (keiths@localhost) by makita.cygnus.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.6.4) with ESMTP id KAA16801 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:49:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: makita.cygnus.com: keiths owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:49:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: [MI] -break-insert: (a)synchronous? In-Reply-To: <3D0A1AE0.4030209@cygnus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2 On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > This means another MI version bump (currently it is on 1). See how mi0 > vs mi1 was handled (especially in the testsuite). I'll take care of it. Unless I hear otherwise, I will modify the code to support old and new. Are we going to set a date or time limit on deprecating the old mis? > BTW, there is another necessary interface change lurking in the wings - > frames need to be changed to lists (dump of frame_id) instead of single > values - so the version bump is likely a good idea. Yes, indeed. I guess it's a good time to make drastic changes? ;-) > How to do it? > > I guess prototype the changes with -i=mi2 and then when ready do the > testsuite suffle for the test cases that are effected. Will do. Thanks for the note. Keith