From: "Dave Korn" <dk@artimi.com>
To: "'Stephen & Linda Smith'" <ischis2@cox.net>,
"'Andrew Cagney'" <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: "'Kevin Buettner'" <kevinb@redhat.com>, <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: shared library support hookin the remote.c
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <NUTMEGt3HvoFOAmEaJs000008b0@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40F57B9C.6020704@cox.net>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-owner On Behalf Of Stephen & Linda Smith
> Sent: 14 July 2004 19:30
> There is one thing I don't understand about the F packet. How
> does the
> inferior know that it is OK to send the packet. From
> everything that I
> have read. Comunication is initiated by GDB and answered by the
> inferior. I didn't know that the stub could initiate a
> packet.
I think that's exactly what happens when the inferior hits a breakpoint,
isn't it? Gdb can't know that it's about to do that, so the stub is sending
a spontaneous (in the sense of not reqested by gdb) status or expedited
response packet.
It occurs to me that "Send a gratuitious expedited response" might perhaps
the answer to that guy's question who wanted to invalidate gdb's cached
state. Assuming he's only after invalidating the regcache, that is.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-14 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-20 21:05 shared library support Stephen P. Smith
2004-05-21 20:49 ` Stephen P. Smith
2004-06-11 21:14 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-06-24 1:55 ` shared library support hookin the remote.c Stephen & Linda Smith
2004-06-28 21:44 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-06-28 21:45 ` Stephen P. Smith
2004-06-29 1:55 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-06-29 1:56 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2004-07-01 17:58 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-07-02 20:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-02 21:16 ` Stephen P. Smith
2004-07-02 22:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-13 20:15 ` Stephen P. Smith
2004-07-14 18:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-14 18:44 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
2004-07-14 19:05 ` Dave Korn [this message]
2004-07-14 19:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-02 21:25 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-07-02 22:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-02 23:22 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-07-08 15:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-28 3:04 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-08-03 14:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-29 2:13 Stephen & Linda Smith
2004-06-29 6:27 ` Stephen & Linda Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=NUTMEGt3HvoFOAmEaJs000008b0@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM \
--to=dk@artimi.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ischis2@cox.net \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox