Re: shared library support hookin the remote.c

[Stephen & Linda Smith <ischis2@cox.net>]

Andrew Cagney wrote:

>
> So each time the inferior stops, GDB will need to re-poll for shlib 
> changes?

That is the way I currently have it set up.

There is one thing I don't understand about the F packet. How does the 
inferior know that it is OK to send the packet. From everything that I 
have read. Comunication is initiated by GDB and answered by the 
inferior. I didn't know that the stub could initiate a packet. If so, Do 
I just tack on the F packet information to the end of a currently 
generated packet?

This is the reason I was polling. Otherwise I prefer to not poll.

>
> Can the stub instead generate a packet, very like the recently added F 
> (File I/O) indicating that the link map changed (and what)?

I think I have answered this by answering the preceding question.

>
> The other is to have a custom xxx-shlib hooked up to inferior stopped 
> that queries for the stuff you describe. It could probably be tunneled 
> as a TARGET_OBJECT_KOD packet.
>
If I implement the F packet would that get rid if the need for a xxx-shlib?