* Stepping through code with breakpoints on adjacent address lines.
@ 2005-01-31 9:28 Matt Fyles
2005-01-31 16:43 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matt Fyles @ 2005-01-31 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
I just wanted to clear up the expected behavior when stepping code that has
breakpoints on adjacent address lines.
In this simple example.
0x0 instruction A
0x4 instruction B
0x8 instruction C
If I break on addresses 0x0, 0x4 and 0x8 with the break *(address)
functionality and then continue to 0x0 and step the other 2 instructions I
only ever see the breakpoint trigger on address 0x0. GDB steps to the next 2
addresses but does not report a breakpoint at either location. Is this the
expected behavior.
It looks from the source in infrun.c (handle_inferior_event()) that if the
trap_expected flag is set then it discards any breakpoint matching at the
current address.
Any thoughts?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Stepping through code with breakpoints on adjacent address lines.
2005-01-31 9:28 Stepping through code with breakpoints on adjacent address lines Matt Fyles
@ 2005-01-31 16:43 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2005-01-31 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Fyles; +Cc: gdb
Matt Fyles wrote:
> I just wanted to clear up the expected behavior when stepping code that has
> breakpoints on adjacent address lines.
>
> In this simple example.
>
> 0x0 instruction A
> 0x4 instruction B
> 0x8 instruction C
>
> If I break on addresses 0x0, 0x4 and 0x8 with the break *(address)
> functionality and then continue to 0x0 and step the other 2 instructions I
> only ever see the breakpoint trigger on address 0x0. GDB steps to the next 2
> addresses but does not report a breakpoint at either location. Is this the
> expected behavior.
>
> It looks from the source in infrun.c (handle_inferior_event()) that if the
> trap_expected flag is set then it discards any breakpoint matching at the
> current address.
Smells like a broken edge case. Here's similar equally wierd behavior:
(top-gdb) info break
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
4 breakpoint keep y 0x1004e83c in main
at
/home/scratch/GDB/src/gdb/gdb.c:30
breakpoint already hit 1 time
5 breakpoint keep y 0x1004e83c in main
at
/home/scratch/GDB/src/gdb/gdb.c:31
breakpoint already hit 1 time
6 breakpoint keep y 0x1004e844 in main
at
/home/scratch/GDB/src/gdb/gdb.c:33
7 breakpoint keep y 0x1004e840 in main
at
/home/scratch/GDB/src/gdb/gdb.c:32
8 breakpoint keep y 0x1004e84c in main
at
/home/scratch/GDB/src/gdb/gdb.c:34
breakpoint already hit 1 time
((top-gdb) run
Breakpoint 4, main (argc=0x1, argv=0x7ffff954)
at /home/scratch/GDB/src/gdb/gdb.c:31
31 args.argc = argc;
(top-gdb) s
32 args.argv = argv;
(top-gdb)
33 args.use_windows = 0;
(top-gdb)
Breakpoint 8, main (argc=0x1, argv=0x7ffff954)
at /home/scratch/GDB/src/gdb/gdb.c:34
34 args.interpreter_p = INTERP_CONSOLE;
(top-gdb) info break
Would you be able to come up with an automated testcase?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-31 16:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-31 9:28 Stepping through code with breakpoints on adjacent address lines Matt Fyles
2005-01-31 16:43 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox