From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>, gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>,
gcc@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Reference to .debug_loc
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F844B74D-4051-11D7-89CE-000393575BCC@dberlin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030214152619.GD30416@nevyn.them.org>
On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 10:26 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:57:55PM +0100, Michal Ludvig wrote:
>> Hi again,
>> when location lists are in use, .debug_info looks like this:
>>
>> .section .debug_info
>> .long 0x187 # Length of Compilation Unit Info
>> .value 0x2 # DWARF version number
>> .long .Ldebug_abbrev0 # Offset Into Abbrev. Section
>> .byte 0x8 # Pointer Size (in bytes)
>> .uleb128 0x1 # (DIE (0xb) DW_TAG_compile_unit)
>> .long .Ldebug_line0 # DW_AT_stmt_list
>> .quad .Letext0 # DW_AT_high_pc
>> .quad .Ltext0 # DW_AT_low_pc
>> .byte 0x1 # DW_AT_language
>> [...]
>> .uleb128 0x3 # (DIE (0x50) DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
>> .long .LASF2 # DW_AT_name: "value"
>> .byte 0x1 # DW_AT_decl_file
>> .byte 0x2 # DW_AT_decl_line
>> .long 0x8f # DW_AT_type
>> .long .LLST0-.Ldebug_loc0 # DW_AT_location
>>
>> So, the reference to .debug_loc on the last line of the example
>> (DW_AT_location) is an offset within that section, ie. it's 0 (NULL)
>> for
>> the first entry with a location list. However when I link several .o
>> files together, each of them have DW_AT_location entries based at the
>> same NULL.
>>
Err, why?
If they are in different files, it should be adjusting the offsets when
it merges the sections together, no?
>> This time I realy can't see a way to find out at what position in the
>> resulting (ie. linked from several ones) .debug_loc should I start
>> reading for a given compilation unit.
>>
>> Should there be something more in the CU header? Something similar to
>> .long .Ldebug_abbrev0 # Offset Into Abbrev. Section
>> For example
>> .long .Ldebug_loc0 # Offset Into Loclist Section
>>
No.
>> Or is there another way?
>
> At a guess it should be like DW_AT_ranges:
> .long .Ldebug_ranges0+0x0 # DW_AT_ranges
>
> I.E. dw2_asm_output_offset, rather than dw2_asm_output_delta, in GCC.
>
It's supposed to be the offset from the beginning of the debug_loc
section.
Will this do that?
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-14 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-14 14:57 Michal Ludvig
2003-02-14 15:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-14 19:24 ` Daniel Berlin [this message]
2003-02-14 19:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-14 20:23 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-02-14 20:35 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-02-14 20:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-17 14:55 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-14 21:09 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-02-19 10:51 ` Michal Ludvig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F844B74D-4051-11D7-89CE-000393575BCC@dberlin.org \
--to=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gcc@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mludvig@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox