From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
Cc: gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>, gcc@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Reference to .debug_loc
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E4D03F3.40103@suse.cz> (raw)
Hi again,
when location lists are in use, .debug_info looks like this:
.section .debug_info
.long 0x187 # Length of Compilation Unit Info
.value 0x2 # DWARF version number
.long .Ldebug_abbrev0 # Offset Into Abbrev. Section
.byte 0x8 # Pointer Size (in bytes)
.uleb128 0x1 # (DIE (0xb) DW_TAG_compile_unit)
.long .Ldebug_line0 # DW_AT_stmt_list
.quad .Letext0 # DW_AT_high_pc
.quad .Ltext0 # DW_AT_low_pc
.byte 0x1 # DW_AT_language
[...]
.uleb128 0x3 # (DIE (0x50) DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
.long .LASF2 # DW_AT_name: "value"
.byte 0x1 # DW_AT_decl_file
.byte 0x2 # DW_AT_decl_line
.long 0x8f # DW_AT_type
.long .LLST0-.Ldebug_loc0 # DW_AT_location
So, the reference to .debug_loc on the last line of the example
(DW_AT_location) is an offset within that section, ie. it's 0 (NULL) for
the first entry with a location list. However when I link several .o
files together, each of them have DW_AT_location entries based at the
same NULL.
This time I realy can't see a way to find out at what position in the
resulting (ie. linked from several ones) .debug_loc should I start
reading for a given compilation unit.
Should there be something more in the CU header? Something similar to
.long .Ldebug_abbrev0 # Offset Into Abbrev. Section
For example
.long .Ldebug_loc0 # Offset Into Loclist Section
Or is there another way?
Thanks in advance!
Michal Ludvig
--
* SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz
* (+420) 296.545.373 * http://www.suse.cz
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-14 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-14 14:57 Michal Ludvig [this message]
2003-02-14 15:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-14 19:24 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-02-14 19:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-14 20:23 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-02-14 20:35 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-02-14 20:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-17 14:55 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-14 21:09 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-02-19 10:51 ` Michal Ludvig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E4D03F3.40103@suse.cz \
--to=mludvig@suse.cz \
--cc=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=gcc@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox