From: Dmitry Smirnov <divis1969@mail.ru>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: How to catch GDB crash
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1KFsw2-000BIb-00.divis1969-mail-ru@f124.mail.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807071528.57718.pedro@codesourcery.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org, Dmitry Smirnov <divis1969@mail.ru>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 15:28:57 +0100
Subject: Re: How to catch GDB crash
> I think you said earlier that when you switched to the other eclipse you
> had around that got over the "^running" problem, you weren't even able
> to inspect the stack or do any disassembling -- eclipse would get
> stuck on the "info threads" command. I take it that since you
> report you can now retrieve variables etc, that the "info threads"
> issue is fixed? I'll post this patch for review at gdb-patches@.
Perhaps, "info threads" is fixed. But since both "info threads" and "running" problems were [most probably] caused by the "main thread registering" fix, maybe it is better to investigate "^running" problem before submission? What if they are connected? ;-)
I have to say, that my goal is not just report issues, I would like to help fixing them. Unfortunately, I do not have much time to learn GDB, so I'm just asking for hints: what can I do to discover the root cause. For example, who is responding "^running"? What functions/files should I debug to figure out the problem?
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-07 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-24 17:03 Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-24 17:29 ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-25 8:03 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-25 23:28 ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-26 13:56 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-26 14:21 ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-26 14:33 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-30 15:58 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-07-02 11:05 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-07-02 11:52 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-02 12:51 ` Re[2]: " Dmitry Smirnov
2008-07-05 3:15 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-07 8:36 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-07-07 14:29 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-07 15:47 ` Dmitry Smirnov [this message]
2008-07-07 16:01 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-08 8:27 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-07-01 11:38 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-07-01 11:41 ` Pedro Alves
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-24 12:39 Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-24 12:58 ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-24 8:52 Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-23 16:32 Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-23 16:57 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-06-23 17:12 ` Michael Snyder
2008-06-23 18:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-06-23 18:32 ` Michael Snyder
2008-06-23 18:36 ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-23 19:37 ` Brian Dessent
2008-06-23 20:50 ` Dr. Rolf Jansen
2008-06-23 20:59 ` Dr. Rolf Jansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1KFsw2-000BIb-00.divis1969-mail-ru@f124.mail.ru \
--to=divis1969@mail.ru \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox