From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org, Dmitry Smirnov <divis1969@mail.ru>
Subject: Re: How to catch GDB crash
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807071528.57718.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1KFmCF-0001Gl-00.divis1969-mail-ru@f134.mail.ru>
A Monday 07 July 2008 09:35:43, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Didn't have much time to digger.
> It seems that Eclipse CDT debugger is confused with the delayed "running"
> response.
Oh, sorry if I didn't make it clear. This patch was to fix the "info threads"
issue you found, not the "^running" problem.
> CDT can connect to the remote debugger, retireve stack (it is
> absent at this point, in fact), retrieve variables, disassebling. But when
> I try to run it ("-exec-continue") there is nothing responded from gdb
> (i.e. "running" until it hits the breakpoint. Since in my case, it takes
> significant time to get to BP, Eclipse decides that target is not
> responding and either terminates ("gdbServer" CDT debugger) or behaves
> oddly ("Hardware" CDT Debugger): it sends commands like usual but do not
> show retrieved data (gdb itself responses correctly).
>
I think you said earlier that when you switched to the other eclipse you
had around that got over the "^running" problem, you weren't even able
to inspect the stack or do any disassembling -- eclipse would get
stuck on the "info threads" command. I take it that since you
report you can now retrieve variables etc, that the "info threads"
issue is fixed? I'll post this patch for review at gdb-patches@.
Thanks,
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-07 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-24 17:03 Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-24 17:29 ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-25 8:03 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-25 23:28 ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-26 13:56 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-26 14:21 ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-26 14:33 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-30 15:58 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-07-02 11:05 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-07-02 11:52 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-02 12:51 ` Re[2]: " Dmitry Smirnov
2008-07-05 3:15 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-07 8:36 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-07-07 14:29 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2008-07-07 15:47 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-07-07 16:01 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-08 8:27 ` Dmitry Smirnov
2008-07-01 11:38 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-07-01 11:41 ` Pedro Alves
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-24 12:39 Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-24 12:58 ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-24 8:52 Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-23 16:32 Dmitry Smirnov
2008-06-23 16:57 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2008-06-23 17:12 ` Michael Snyder
2008-06-23 18:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-06-23 18:32 ` Michael Snyder
2008-06-23 18:36 ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-23 19:37 ` Brian Dessent
2008-06-23 20:50 ` Dr. Rolf Jansen
2008-06-23 20:59 ` Dr. Rolf Jansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807071528.57718.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=divis1969@mail.ru \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox