Re: bugzilla

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>]

On Jul 8, 2004, at 11:06 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote:

>> On Jul 8, 2004, at 10:31 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>> Please discuss :-)
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> I've cc'd DanielB and ChrisF who would need to be involved in any 
>>> logistical matters.
>>>
>> I've converted the GDB GNATS database before with little or no 
>> problems.
>> I can put the results up on www.dberlin.org/bugzilla if you want to 
>> see what it looks like
>> The only real problem in conversion is that the bugs will not have 
>> the same PR number they used to, though they will be contiguous (IE 
>> they will be offset by some number).
>
> Why is a renumbering needed?  It's our database can't we do what we 
> like? :-)

I was planning on putting you guys in the same bugzilla as the other 
sources projects (sources.redhat.com/bugzilla).
Bugs id's are global to a given bugzilla, not local to a given product.
There exist bugs starting with the number one in there already.  Thus, 
gdb bugs would have to start with the highest number at the time of the 
import.