From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13035 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2004 15:16:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13026 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2004 15:16:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (69.3.5.6) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2004 15:16:43 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.7] (account dberlin HELO [192.168.1.7]) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b6) with ESMTP-TLS id 7063069; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 11:16:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <40ED6302.3020704@gnu.org> References: <40ED5AB8.9060304@gnu.org> <745BC5DA-D0EE-11D8-9149-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <40ED6302.3020704@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, Christopher Faylor From: Daniel Berlin Subject: Re: bugzilla Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:16:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 On Jul 8, 2004, at 11:06 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote: >> On Jul 8, 2004, at 10:31 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote: >>> Please discuss :-) >>> >>> -- >>> >>> I've cc'd DanielB and ChrisF who would need to be involved in any >>> logistical matters. >>> >> I've converted the GDB GNATS database before with little or no >> problems. >> I can put the results up on www.dberlin.org/bugzilla if you want to >> see what it looks like >> The only real problem in conversion is that the bugs will not have >> the same PR number they used to, though they will be contiguous (IE >> they will be offset by some number). > > Why is a renumbering needed? It's our database can't we do what we > like? :-) I was planning on putting you guys in the same bugzilla as the other sources projects (sources.redhat.com/bugzilla). Bugs id's are global to a given bugzilla, not local to a given product. There exist bugs starting with the number one in there already. Thus, gdb bugs would have to start with the highest number at the time of the import.