Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Pretty-printing for errno
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 13:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKCAbMgsHH9bJCgELWY6R9sWaZvdqGjdfUFDLihx3mor8HofGw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ed368f7-4469-4a49-c4e3-0c3afc18c121@redhat.com>

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/05/2017 10:15 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>>
>> I don't understand why thread-local variables are inaccessible on my
>> perfectly ordinary x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu workstation (the base OS
>> is Debian 'stretch').  Do you have any idea what might be wrong?
>
> I assume your test program isn't actually linked with -pthread?

That is correct.

> When you do "print errno" in this situation, because there's no
> "#define errno ..." in sight, gdb ends up finding the real "errno" symbol,
> which, even though the program isn't threaded, is a TLS symbol, and as such has
> a DWARF location expression describing its location as an offset into the
> thread-local block for the current thread.  GDB needs to resolve that address, and
> for threaded programs that is normally done with assistance from libthread_db.so.
> The problem is then that libthread_db.so only works with programs that
> link with libpthread.so, and if your test program is actually non-threaded,
> it doesn't link with libpthread.so.

I am not familiar with the glibc-side TLS implementation, nor with
libthread_db.so, nor the code in GDB that uses libthread_db.so.
However, reading the implementation of td_thr_tls_get_addr leads me to
believe that that function is *supposed* to work even if libpthread.so
has not been loaded into the 'inferior'.  If it doesn't, perhaps that
is a bug on our side.  Do you know if GDB even tries? It's not obvious
to me looking at linux-thread-db.c.

> A workaround specifically for errno, and only for live-process debugging [*]
> is the "macro define" trick I had suggested before:
>
>  (gdb) macro define errno (*__errno_location ())
>
> After that, "p errno" ends up calling __errno_location just
> like when you compile the test program with -g3.

Again, is it possible to do (the equivalent of) this from the
initialization code of a pretty-printer module?  Specifically, there
already exists a Python function that's doing this:

def register(objfile):
    """Register pretty printers for the current objfile."""

    printer = gdb.printing.RegexpCollectionPrettyPrinter("glibc-errno")
    printer.add_printer('error_t', r'^(?:__)?error_t', ErrnoPrinter)

    if objfile == None:
        objfile = gdb

    gdb.printing.register_pretty_printer(objfile, printer)

called when the module is loaded; what would I need to add to that so
that the macro is defined (if it isn't already)?

zw


  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-06 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-22 22:45 Zack Weinberg
2017-06-22 22:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] Improve testing of GDB pretty-printers Zack Weinberg
2017-06-22 22:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] Add pretty-printer for errno Zack Weinberg
2017-06-22 22:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] Make error_t always int; make __errno_location return an __error_t Zack Weinberg
2017-06-29 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Pretty-printing for errno Phil Muldoon
2017-06-29 16:53   ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-29 17:02     ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-29 17:28       ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-30  0:28         ` Zack Weinberg
2017-06-30 16:38           ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-30 16:47             ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-30 17:27             ` Zack Weinberg
2017-06-30 18:11               ` Pedro Alves
2017-07-01 11:56                 ` Pedro Alves
2017-07-13  2:30                 ` Pedro Alves
2017-09-04 21:25                   ` Pedro Alves
2017-09-05 21:15                     ` Zack Weinberg
2017-09-05 22:32                       ` Pedro Alves
2017-09-06 13:05                         ` Zack Weinberg [this message]
2017-09-06 13:32                           ` Pedro Alves
2017-09-06 21:03                             ` Zack Weinberg
     [not found]                               ` <2432779a-f146-1612-236e-84dde15c5d01@redhat.com>
2017-09-13 11:22                                 ` Using libthread_db.so with single-threaded programs, for TLS access (was: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Pretty-printing for errno) Pedro Alves
2017-09-13 19:27                                   ` Philippe Waroquiers
2017-09-14  0:02                                   ` Using libthread_db.so with single-threaded programs, for TLS access Pedro Alves
2017-09-18 13:17                                     ` Carlos O'Donell
2017-09-18 14:28                                       ` Pedro Alves
2017-07-01 14:35               ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Pretty-printing for errno Siddhesh Poyarekar
2017-07-04 15:54                 ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKCAbMgsHH9bJCgELWY6R9sWaZvdqGjdfUFDLihx3mor8HofGw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=zackw@panix.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox