Re: Is there single step debugging support being added to aarch64-linux?

[Prafull Suryawanshi <prafull.net@gmail.com>]

I am using gdb to talk to kgdb, so is not issue with gdb?
gdb is not able to set software single step like it do for arm.
There is implementation for gdbarch_software_single_step_p in arm gdb
but not in aarch64 gdb.

In fact, I had small implementation to get next_pc at fixed offset
(+4) and it starts working. (implementing full version)

Let me know.

Thanks,
Prafull


On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Prafull Suryawanshi
<prafull.net@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am using kgdb and trying to do single step (software single step).
> I see that infrun loops. (I enabled remote_debug option and compiled
> gdb 7.7 as 7.9 has issue with connection)
>
> infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (Thread 3462)
> infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (Thread 3444)
> infrun: proceed (addr=0xffffffffffffffff, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_DEFAULT, step=1)
> infrun: resume (step=1, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_0), trap_expected=1, current
> thread [Thread 3462] at 0xffffffc00021014c
> Sending packet: $Hcd86#7d...Ack
> Packet received: OK
> Sending packet: $s#73...Ack
> infrun: wait_for_inferior ()
> Packet received: T05thread:0d86;
> infrun: target_wait (-1, status) =
> infrun:   42000 [Thread 3462],
> infrun:   status->kind = stopped, signal = GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP
> infrun: infwait_normal_state
> infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED
> Sending packet: $g#67...Ack
> Packet received:
> 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
> infrun: stop_pc = 0xffffffc000210150
> Sending packet: $mffffffc000210150,4#4d...Ack
> Packet received: fd030091
> Sending packet: $mffffffc00021014c,4#7f...Ack
> Packet received: fd7ba3a9
> Sending packet: $mffffffc000210150,4#4d...Ack
> Packet received: fd030091
> infrun: stepping inside range [0xffffffc00021014c-0xffffffc000210170]
> Sending packet: $Z0,ffffffc00021014c,4#c8...Ack
> Packet received: OK
> infrun: resume (step=1, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_0), trap_expected=0, current
> thread [Thread 3462] at 0xffffffc000210150
> Sending packet: $Hc0#db...Ack
> Packet received: OK
> Sending packet: $s#73...Ack
> infrun: prepare_to_wait
>
> Then I build the gdb using arch_dump enable option
> gdbarch_dump: gdbarch_software_single_step_p() = 0
>
> I see that in gdb code, function aarch64_linux_software_single_step not present.
>
> I guess above loop expected if aarch64_linux_software_single_step absent, right?
>
> Thanks,
> Prafull
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
>> Prafull Suryawanshi <prafull.net@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I am trying it on 64 bit armv8 system but not able to doit.
>>> Found issue in gdb source code and absence of this function in
>>> aarch64-linux-tdep.c file. Anyone knows if support getting added or
>>> not?
>>
>> The stepi command is working fine on aarch64.  What do you get if you
>> try it?
>>
>> Andreas.
>>
>> --
>> Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
>> GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
>> "And now for something completely different."