Re: sim: using automake

[Doug Evans <dje@google.com>]

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:
>
> Mike> ive been bit by this multiple times, and it always seemed crazy to
> Mike> me that we still do manual dependency management.  many of the
> Mike> other sourceware projects have converted to automake and dropped
> Mike> the hardcoded lists, so is there anything holding back the sim dir
> Mike> other than someone doing it ?
>
> It seems like an improvement to me.

"Well ..."
I'd rather not make this transition without a bit more discussion.
[I would prefer to avoid automake.]

One question and one observation:

Question: can automake handle dependencies on machine generated files?
I think(!) the answer is "no", so automake doesn't solve all problems.

Observation: gdb no longer manually describes dependencies (*1) yet it
doesn't use automake.

---
(*1): I realize it's more complicated than that, e.g. source files from subdirs.