From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gdb@sourceware.org, hellogcc@freelists.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Built kernel without -O2 option
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinVH0X_wmHgQSeYT-JMVWAjO3CHvy=jh1817swj@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinpX0p8hv_RJojASbjDNYQ60bODo3kLBobRDtmf@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 05:07, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now, there are a lot of ways to debug the Linux kernel with GDB, like
>> qemu, kgtp or kgdb and so on.
>> But the developer more like add a printk. It have a lot of reason, a big one is:
>> (gdb) p ret
>> $3 = <value optimized out>
>> And the code execution order is not right.
>>
>> This is becuase the Kernel is bult with gcc -O2. Gcc will not
>> generate enough debug message with file with -O2.
>> So GDB cannot work very well with Linux kernel.
>>
>> So I make a patch that add a option in "Kernel hacking" called "Close
>> GCC optimization". It will make kernel be built without -O2.
>>
> no, it does not, see below ..
>
>> I built and use it in i386 and x86_64. I will try to make it OK in other arch.
>>
>> And I will put new patch in here and
>> http://code.google.com/p/kgtp/downloads/list
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> [...]
>> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_CLOSE_OPTIMIZATION
>> +CFLAGS_process_$(BITS).o += -O2
>> +CFLAGS_entry_$(BITS).o += -O2
>> +CFLAGS_traps.o += -O2
>> +CFLAGS_i387.o += -O2
>> +CFLAGS_xsave.o += -O2
>> +CFLAGS_hpet.o += -O2
>> +endif
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> @@ -136,6 +136,14 @@ config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
>> - Enable verbose reporting from modpost to help solving
>> the section mismatches reported.
>>
>> +config CC_CLOSE_OPTIMIZATION
>> + bool "Close GCC optimization"
>> + default n
>> + help
>> + Enabling this option will let gcc build kernel without "-O2".
>> +
>> + If unsure, say N.
>> +
> You are not consistent with yourself, you add an option saying "do not
> build the kernel with -O2" and yet, you add "-O2" flags for unknown
> reason all over the tree...
>
> - Arnaud
>
You are really good at English. But not mathematics.
Add -O2 to build 30 files is better than add -O2 to all files(who know
how much files in Linux Kernel?).
Thanks,
Hui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-01 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-29 3:56 Hui Zhu
2010-11-29 8:11 ` Américo Wang
2010-11-29 8:18 ` microcai
2010-11-29 8:25 ` Hui Zhu
[not found] ` <4CF36741.9000808@loongson.cn>
2010-11-29 8:48 ` [hellogcc] " Hui Zhu
2010-11-29 8:55 ` Steven
2010-11-29 8:58 ` Hui Zhu
[not found] ` <4CF3762B.9010102@loongson.cn>
2010-11-29 18:11 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-11-29 18:35 ` Steven J. Magnani
[not found] ` <20101129220350.GA10923@core2.telecom.by>
2010-12-01 13:22 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-01 12:23 ` bekars
2010-12-01 13:24 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-01 13:58 ` bekars
2010-12-01 15:02 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-01 15:42 ` jovi zhang
2010-11-29 8:48 ` Américo Wang
2010-11-29 9:11 ` Hui Zhu
2010-11-29 18:05 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-11-29 20:51 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2010-11-29 21:00 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2010-11-29 21:07 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2010-11-29 9:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-11-29 11:12 ` Segher Boessenkool
2010-11-29 11:17 ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-11-29 11:57 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2010-12-01 12:18 ` Hui Zhu
2010-11-29 9:59 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-29 10:12 ` Mark Wielaard
2010-11-30 9:26 ` Américo Wang
2010-11-30 18:40 ` Michael Snyder
2010-12-01 12:52 ` Hui Zhu
2010-11-29 19:06 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-29 21:07 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2010-11-30 22:40 ` Petr Hluzín
2010-12-01 13:42 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-01 13:11 ` Hui Zhu [this message]
2011-01-24 7:48 ` Hui Zhu
2011-01-24 8:11 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-01-24 12:42 ` Hui Zhu
2011-01-28 3:41 ` Hui Zhu
2011-02-17 2:44 ` Hui Zhu
[not found] ` <AANLkTik+beFdZZHLyei044q8EPHwvmiKoFAvAHsNuhmw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-02-21 12:52 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-02-23 5:20 ` Hui Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTinVH0X_wmHgQSeYT-JMVWAjO3CHvy=jh1817swj@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=teawater@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=hellogcc@freelists.org \
--cc=lacombar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox