Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gdb@sourceware.org, hellogcc@freelists.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Built kernel without -O2 option
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimwnKamJ+UBO1CCn9Hb3PWGgFmC1c0iQr_KeyzO@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r5e4lab7.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 17:59, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Now, there are a lot of ways to debug the Linux kernel with GDB, like
>> qemu, kgtp or kgdb and so on.
>> But the developer more like add a printk. It have a lot of reason, a big one is:
>> (gdb) p ret
>> $3 = <value optimized out>
>> And the code execution order is not right.
>
> Really the right place to fix a lot of this would be gcc (and perhaps
> gdb). I suspect with some careful work the debugging experience
> for -O2 could be improved a lot.
> I also believe the latest gccs already have improvements in this area.
>

If you think they are OK, go get a new gcc and try.  :)

>>
>> This is becuase the Kernel is bult with gcc -O2.  Gcc will not
>> generate enough debug message with file with -O2.
>> So GDB cannot work very well with Linux kernel.
>>
>> So I make a patch that add a option in "Kernel hacking" called "Close
>> GCC optimization".  It will make kernel be built without -O2.
>
>
> You need to at least keep aggressive inlining for header files,
> otherwise there will be too much code bloat and bad code.
>
> Like -O1 -finline-functions ?
>

If I can build OK, why I need add some options?

Thanks,
Hui


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-01 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-29  3:56 Hui Zhu
2010-11-29  8:11 ` Américo Wang
2010-11-29  8:18   ` microcai
2010-11-29  8:25   ` Hui Zhu
     [not found]     ` <4CF36741.9000808@loongson.cn>
2010-11-29  8:48       ` [hellogcc] " Hui Zhu
2010-11-29  8:55         ` Steven
2010-11-29  8:58           ` Hui Zhu
     [not found]         ` <4CF3762B.9010102@loongson.cn>
2010-11-29 18:11           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-11-29 18:35             ` Steven J. Magnani
     [not found]             ` <20101129220350.GA10923@core2.telecom.by>
2010-12-01 13:22               ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-01 12:23           ` bekars
2010-12-01 13:24             ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-01 13:58               ` bekars
2010-12-01 15:02                 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-01 15:42                   ` jovi zhang
2010-11-29  8:48     ` Américo Wang
2010-11-29  9:11       ` Hui Zhu
2010-11-29 18:05       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-11-29 20:51       ` richard -rw- weinberger
2010-11-29 21:00         ` Arnaud Lacombe
2010-11-29 21:07           ` richard -rw- weinberger
2010-11-29  9:44   ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-11-29 11:12     ` Segher Boessenkool
2010-11-29 11:17       ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-11-29 11:57         ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2010-12-01 12:18     ` Hui Zhu
2010-11-29  9:59 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-29 10:12   ` Mark Wielaard
2010-11-30  9:26     ` Américo Wang
2010-11-30 18:40       ` Michael Snyder
2010-12-01 12:52   ` Hui Zhu [this message]
2010-11-29 19:06 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-29 21:07 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2010-11-30 22:40   ` Petr Hluzín
2010-12-01 13:42     ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-01 13:11   ` Hui Zhu
2011-01-24  7:48 ` Hui Zhu
2011-01-24  8:11   ` Kevin Pouget
2011-01-24 12:42     ` Hui Zhu
2011-01-28  3:41       ` Hui Zhu
2011-02-17  2:44         ` Hui Zhu
     [not found]           ` <AANLkTik+beFdZZHLyei044q8EPHwvmiKoFAvAHsNuhmw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-02-21 12:52             ` Kevin Pouget
2011-02-23  5:20             ` Hui Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTimwnKamJ+UBO1CCn9Hb3PWGgFmC1c0iQr_KeyzO@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=teawater@gmail.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hellogcc@freelists.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox