From: "Oldham, Adam" <adam.oldham@marconi.com>
To: "'Andrew Cagney'" <ac131313@cygnus.com>,
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: Maurice Lombardi <Maurice.Lombardi@ujf-grenoble.fr>,
"Oldham, Adam" <adam.oldham@marconi.com>,
gdb@sources.redhat.com, core@freepascal.org, gpc@gnu.de
Subject: RE: GDB scope does not work quite right for Pascal
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A3E34B558F5CD211B4980008C7A4A99003883EC6@sparrow.gso.mcs.marconi.com> (raw)
Yes, I saw some of these threads, but nothing seemed to shed light on fixes
for the scoping of this. It is good to know Ada does this as well so that
maybe us Ada/Pascal people can get together and come up with a fix.
I submitted code that demonstrates this with my bug report as well....
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Cagney [ mailto:ac131313@cygnus.com ]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 1:40 PM
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; Pierre Muller
Cc: Maurice Lombardi; adam.oldham@marconi.com; gdb@sources.redhat.com;
core@freepascal.org; gpc@gnu.de
Subject: Re: GDB scope does not work quite right for Pascal
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 06:57:32PM +0200, Maurice Lombardi wrote:
>
>> > There are several remarks to that bug report:
>> > 1) I don't know at all how nested functions work in C
>> >Are they allowed?
>
>>
>>
>> AKAIK no, they are not allowed, and this is the root of the problem,
>> since gdb is written mainly by/for C programmers.
>
>
> They aren't allowed by standard C. GCC does in fact allow them,
> although their use isn't recommended. I think GDB's support for them
> is somewhat crusty.
The thread
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-07/msg00714.html is
probably relevant.
Following on Joel's strategy (Ada) the first thing needed is probably a
testcase so that people know the status of the underlying code
Andrew
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: levi@localhost.nc3a.nato.int
To: levi@localhost.nc3a.nato.int
Cc: Maurice Lombardi <Maurice.Lombardi@ujf-grenoble.fr>,
"Oldham, Adam" <adam.oldham@marconi.com>,
gdb@sources.redhat.com, core@freepascal.org, gpc@gnu.de
Subject: Re: GDB scope does not work quite right for Pascal
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 04:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A3E34B558F5CD211B4980008C7A4A99003883EC6@sparrow.gso.mcs.marconi.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20020201042900.G0TcoHF9bMlmdqn5bJI2wf1BlrghjhwH-fsdCZklUQo@z> (raw)
Yes, I saw some of these threads, but nothing seemed to shed light on fixes
for the scoping of this. It is good to know Ada does this as well so that
maybe us Ada/Pascal people can get together and come up with a fix.
I submitted code that demonstrates this with my bug report as well....
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Cagney [mailto:ac131313@cygnus.com]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 1:40 PM
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; Pierre Muller
Cc: Maurice Lombardi; adam.oldham@marconi.com; gdb@sources.redhat.com;
core@freepascal.org; gpc@gnu.de
Subject: Re: GDB scope does not work quite right for Pascal
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 06:57:32PM +0200, Maurice Lombardi wrote:
>
>> > There are several remarks to that bug report:
>> > 1) I don't know at all how nested functions work in C
>> >Are they allowed?
>
>>
>>
>> AKAIK no, they are not allowed, and this is the root of the problem,
>> since gdb is written mainly by/for C programmers.
>
>
> They aren't allowed by standard C. GCC does in fact allow them,
> although their use isn't recommended. I think GDB's support for them
> is somewhat crusty.
The thread
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-07/msg00714.html is
probably relevant.
Following on Joel's strategy (Ada) the first thing needed is probably a
testcase so that people know the status of the underlying code
Andrew
next reply other threads:[~2001-10-12 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-12 11:21 Oldham, Adam [this message]
2002-02-01 4:29 ` levi
[not found] <20011012124403.21432.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
2002-02-01 4:29 ` levi
2001-10-12 8:29 ` Pierre Muller
2001-10-12 9:58 ` Maurice Lombardi
2002-02-01 4:29 ` levi
2002-02-01 4:29 ` levi
2001-10-12 10:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-01 4:29 ` levi
2001-10-12 10:40 ` Andrew Cagney
[not found] <A3E34B558F5CD211B4980008C7A4A99003883EC6@sparrow.gso.mcs.m arconi.com>
2002-02-01 4:29 ` levi
2001-10-12 16:38 ` Pierre Muller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A3E34B558F5CD211B4980008C7A4A99003883EC6@sparrow.gso.mcs.marconi.com \
--to=adam.oldham@marconi.com \
--cc=Maurice.Lombardi@ujf-grenoble.fr \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=core@freepascal.org \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gpc@gnu.de \
--cc=muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox