From: Florent DEFAY <spira.inhabitant@gmail.com>
To: jeremy.bennett@embecosm.com
Cc: Anthony Berent <Anthony.Berent@arm.com>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: new port
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 08:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8502af3c0905200126v68b6d474g9ee399bc163e8b5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242311828.2994.39.camel@thomas>
Hi,
Jeremy,
I try to rewrite my target-tdep.c from the beginning taking
or1k-tdep.c as a template.
In the function or1k_frame_unwind_cache,
you get SP that way:
this_sp = or1k_unwind_sp (gdbarch, next_frame);
But this function could be called at any step of the prologue.
As SP is added the frame size at the beginning of the prologue,
I think this_sp is always the good value (the base). But in my case,
the prologue begins by pushing saved registers and then
SP changes at every step. So if I get SP by doing
this_sp = or1k_unwind_sp (gdbarch, next_frame);
I get the SP value at this step of the execution, not the final value.
(1) So I cannot find the base:
trad_frame_set_this_base (info, this_sp);
is not correct (the base is the final value, this_sp is not the final value).
(2) Plus, I need the SP when entering the called function because
this is where PREVIOUS PC is saved.
I think of a solution for (2):
As I know PC, I can compute how many saved regs pushes
have been already done. Then,
or1k_unwind_sp (gdbarch, next_frame) + NUM_PUSHES * REG_SIZE
gives me the SP when entering the function (falling stack).
Do you think this solution is ok?
Have you an idea for the issue (1) ?
Thank you.
Regards.
Florent
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-20 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-14 13:24 Florent DEFAY
2009-05-14 13:50 ` Hui Zhu
2009-05-14 14:05 ` Anthony Berent
2009-05-14 14:37 ` Jeremy Bennett
2009-05-20 8:26 ` Florent DEFAY [this message]
2009-05-20 14:12 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-22 12:24 ` Florent DEFAY
2009-05-22 14:43 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-25 7:17 ` Florent DEFAY
2009-05-25 14:59 ` Florent DEFAY
[not found] ` <130942881126505163@unknownmsgid>
2009-05-14 14:46 ` Florent DEFAY
2009-05-14 16:46 ` Hui Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8502af3c0905200126v68b6d474g9ee399bc163e8b5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=spira.inhabitant@gmail.com \
--cc=Anthony.Berent@arm.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=jeremy.bennett@embecosm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox