From: Florent DEFAY <spira.inhabitant@gmail.com>
To: Anthony Berent <Anthony.Berent@arm.com>, jeremy.bennett@embecosm.com
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: new port
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 14:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8502af3c0905140746h7042ba95ja458737b87e82f81@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <130942881126505163@unknownmsgid>
Thank you very much for the tips. You are right.
When I step into the function with stepi:
(1) If I try 'info frame' just before the first instruction, then
results an internal error.
(2) If I try 'info frame' just after the first intsuction, then I get
frame information.
I set up traces to know which functions GDB crosses in my target-tdep.c.
I can tell that skip_prologue is called only after processing the
first instruction,
I think it should be called before, shouldn't it?
Thank you for the HOWTO, I jump on it.
Regards.
Florent
2009/5/14 Anthony Berent <Anthony.Berent@arm.com>:
> Florent,
>
> I have also been porting to a new architecture, and recently solved similar
> problems with next. The way next works is that, after a step, it checks
> whether an extra frame has been added to the stack. If it has, and various
> other checks are satisfied, then it places a breakpoint on the return
> address and runs on. Otherwise it simply stops after the first step.
>
> Try stepping into the function using stepi, stopping at its first
> instruction, and then having a look at the stack frames (using bt and "info
> frames"). If these look wrong then that is probably your problem.
>
> - Anthony
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf
> Of Florent DEFAY
> Sent: 14 May 2009 14:24
> To: gdb@sourceware.org
> Subject: new port
>
> Hi,
>
> I work on porting GDB to a new arch.
> I already ported GCC.
>
> I meet some problems, I need help.
>
> At the moment, I can use most of basic GDB commands.
>
> I can set breakpoints and stop on them. I can set breakpoints on function
> names.
> I can step. I can read locals and registers.
>
> When I use the command 'next', it should step and skip functions. The
> problem is that
> indeed it steps but it does not skip functions. It step into the function.
>
> Please help.
>
>
> Regards.
>
> Florent
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-14 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-14 13:24 Florent DEFAY
2009-05-14 13:50 ` Hui Zhu
2009-05-14 14:05 ` Anthony Berent
2009-05-14 14:37 ` Jeremy Bennett
2009-05-20 8:26 ` Florent DEFAY
2009-05-20 14:12 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-22 12:24 ` Florent DEFAY
2009-05-22 14:43 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-25 7:17 ` Florent DEFAY
2009-05-25 14:59 ` Florent DEFAY
[not found] ` <130942881126505163@unknownmsgid>
2009-05-14 14:46 ` Florent DEFAY [this message]
2009-05-14 16:46 ` Hui Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8502af3c0905140746h7042ba95ja458737b87e82f81@mail.gmail.com \
--to=spira.inhabitant@gmail.com \
--cc=Anthony.Berent@arm.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=jeremy.bennett@embecosm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox