Re: Inadvertently run inferior threads

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:15:03 +0000
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> CC: gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> > Yes, but in my case the called function didn't really start any
> > threads...
> 
> If emacs doesn't start a new thread directly, it just looks to
> me that some Windows API function internally spawns them
> sometimes, then?

Yes, I think so.

> From gdb's perspective, it's exactly the same thing, it's all code
> in the inferior.

Certainly.

> >> (gdb) info threads
> >>   Id   Target Id         Frame
> >>   2    Thread 0x7ffff7fc1700 (LWP 9903) "start-thread-in" (running)
> >> * 1    Thread 0x7ffff7fc2740 (LWP 9899) "start-thread-in" main () at start-thread-infcall.c:35
> > 
> > What does "start-thread-in" signify in this display?
> 
> It's the thread name, which defaults to the binary's file name name,
> which was "start-thread-infcall", but Linux trims it to 15 or so
> characters, IIRC.  For this to work, you need to implement the
> target_thread_name hook.  AFAICS, only linux-nat.c implements this.

Well, Windows threads don't really have names, AFAIK.

Thanks.