From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Bill Morgan <arthurwilliammorgan@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: gdb ignoring vCont supported commands
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 13:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <818ac329-32b3-219d-ad28-11a7961b24ad@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM4wpo9LC_n8dQmPGuBHK0PXkbnic96dF=MMgOf7L+TNWcAEAw@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/18/2018 02:42 PM, Bill Morgan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 4:12 PM Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/09/2018 09:29 PM, Bill Morgan wrote:
>>>
>>> So it is now recognizing the vContSupported, but it is still sending
>>> vCont;s
>>>
>>
>> Argh, I forgot that this only really works on ARM GNU/Linux.
>> What is your target?
>>
>> We're missing the small infrastructure change in GDB
>> mentioned in the discussion I linked before.
>>
>
> I couldn't get the change on the other thread to work,
What change do you mean?
> but this has been
> reported before and a patch submitted to fix it.
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21272
>
> I only needed this portion of the patch to get it working.
>
> Any chance on getting it merged to master?
>
No, sorry -- that would make gdb always use software single-step,
even if the stub/probe supports hw stepping.
Not sure about the arm_get_next_pcs_syscall_next_pc change,
but I suppose that it helps with most syscalls.
See <https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ContributionChecklist>.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-19 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-09 13:42 Bill Morgan
2018-10-09 18:30 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-09 20:12 ` Bill Morgan
2018-10-09 20:17 ` Simon Marchi
2018-10-09 20:29 ` Bill Morgan
2018-10-09 21:12 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-09 21:17 ` Bill Morgan
2018-10-09 21:34 ` Bill Morgan
2018-10-19 13:40 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-19 21:18 ` Bill Morgan
2018-10-11 17:23 ` Bill Morgan
2018-10-18 13:42 ` Bill Morgan
2018-10-19 13:35 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2018-10-19 17:12 ` Bill Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=818ac329-32b3-219d-ad28-11a7961b24ad@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=arthurwilliammorgan@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox