From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: dan@cgsoftware.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Cast to a struct in expressions
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6137-Fri27Apr2001204221+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2eluev01g.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu>
> From: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
> Date: 27 Apr 2001 11:23:55 -0400
>
> > A parse error in expression, near `long foo; unsigned bar} *)foobar
> >
> > Seems like the parser chokes on the struct declaration?
> Yes.
> > Am I missing something?
> Yes, I think. The parser only handles expressions, nothing more.
> This is why it's c-exp.y, and not c.y.
> :)
>
> If you have a real struct already defined, of course, and di
>
> p/x *(sturct foostruct *)foobar
>
> then *that* should work.
No, there's no such struct, otherwise I wouldn't be opting for this
complication ;-)
I'm still missing something, because I don't see how "*(struct foo *)x"
differs from "*(struct {long foo; unsigned bar;} *)x". Both are valid
C expression syntax, so the parser should be able to parse them both.
I guess someone just stopped short of making this part of the parser,
because it looks like "struct <name>" is the only syntax it accepts.
Right?
Anyway, thanks for the feedback.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-27 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-27 1:10 Eli Zaretskii
2001-04-27 8:24 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-27 10:41 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2001-04-27 12:30 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-28 1:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-04-28 2:12 ` Paul Hilfinger
2001-04-28 11:30 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-28 11:09 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-28 23:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-04-28 23:52 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-29 0:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6137-Fri27Apr2001204221+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=dan@cgsoftware.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox