* Funny test, gdb.trace/ax.exp
@ 2010-06-08 23:43 Michael Snyder
2010-06-09 0:04 ` Stan Shebs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2010-06-08 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb, Pedro Alves
I say funny, because most of the tests will pass regardless of output.
They all accept "", which is the same as ".*".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Funny test, gdb.trace/ax.exp
2010-06-08 23:43 Funny test, gdb.trace/ax.exp Michael Snyder
@ 2010-06-09 0:04 ` Stan Shebs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stan Shebs @ 2010-06-09 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Snyder; +Cc: gdb, Pedro Alves
Michael Snyder wrote:
> I say funny, because most of the tests will pass regardless of output.
> They all accept "", which is the same as ".*".
>
I was mainly wanting to check that the bytecode compiler didn't go down
in flames and take the rest of GDB with it. :-) Now that we have
tracepoints in GDBserver, this would be better as a live test of
on-target expression evaluation; it might not be too hard to set up a
standard test proc that captures each expression result and compares
with expected value.
Stan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-09 0:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-08 23:43 Funny test, gdb.trace/ax.exp Michael Snyder
2010-06-09 0:04 ` Stan Shebs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox