Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "tromey@redhat.com" <tromey@redhat.com>,
	  Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
	 "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>,
	  Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>,
	 Chris Sutcliffe <ir0nh34d@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gdb-7.1] 10 days to branching...
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B75B5DB.8070607@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002121901.29758.pedro@codesourcery.com>

Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Friday 12 February 2010 17:12:33, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
>> Pedro> How far are we from getting the expr-cumulative branch
>> Pedro> merged?
>>
>> The biggest series is approved for post-7.1.
>> I assume it will go in shortly after the branch is made.
> 
> Great, thanks.  It's fine for the workaround to be applied only on
> the branch then.
> 
>> There are various other things on expr-cumulative that haven't been
>> cleaned up for submission yet.  Those will happen once the first big
>> ("physname") series goes in.
> 

Let's get the MI-reverse patch into 7.1.  I don't care whether we
do it before or after the branch, but this change has been sitting
in the queue for a long time.

AFAIK, the last patches were those dated in the neighborhood
of 12/22/09?



  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-12 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-01  8:20 Joel Brobecker
2010-02-01 16:09 ` Chris Sutcliffe
2010-02-02  4:17   ` Joel Brobecker
2010-02-02 12:35     ` Chris Sutcliffe
2010-02-02 16:02       ` Kai Tietz
2010-02-02 16:27         ` Christopher Faylor
2010-02-02 16:46         ` Chris Sutcliffe
2010-02-02 18:46           ` Kai Tietz
2010-02-02 22:44         ` Christopher Faylor
2010-02-03  8:20           ` Kai Tietz
2010-02-03 19:39             ` Christopher Faylor
2010-02-05 22:02               ` Tom Tromey
2010-02-06  4:55                 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-02-06 16:26                 ` Pedro Alves
2010-02-06 18:41                   ` Matt Rice
2010-02-11 18:25                   ` Tom Tromey
     [not found]                     ` <20100212051007.GI2919@adacore.com>
2010-02-12  6:16                       ` Joel Brobecker
2010-02-12 11:37                         ` Pedro Alves
2010-02-12 11:47                       ` Pedro Alves
2010-02-12 17:13                         ` Tom Tromey
2010-02-12 19:01                           ` Pedro Alves
2010-02-12 20:11                             ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2010-02-03  8:15       ` André Pönitz
2010-02-03 12:01         ` Chris Sutcliffe
2010-02-12  1:24 ` Stan Shebs
2010-02-12  5:11   ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B75B5DB.8070607@vmware.com \
    --to=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=ir0nh34d@gmail.com \
    --cc=ktietz70@googlemail.com \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox