From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28426 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2010 20:11:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 28417 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Feb 2010 20:11:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:11:16 +0000 Received: from jupiter.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A87113051; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:11:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.20.124.101] (promd-2s-dhcp101.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.101]) by jupiter.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A730DC34B; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:11:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B75B5DB.8070607@vmware.com> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:11:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: "tromey@redhat.com" , Joel Brobecker , "gdb@sourceware.org" , Kai Tietz , Chris Sutcliffe Subject: Re: [gdb-7.1] 10 days to branching... References: <20100201081928.GA9204@adacore.com> <201002121147.39525.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201002121901.29758.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <201002121901.29758.pedro@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00105.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > On Friday 12 February 2010 17:12:33, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: >> Pedro> How far are we from getting the expr-cumulative branch >> Pedro> merged? >> >> The biggest series is approved for post-7.1. >> I assume it will go in shortly after the branch is made. > > Great, thanks. It's fine for the workaround to be applied only on > the branch then. > >> There are various other things on expr-cumulative that haven't been >> cleaned up for submission yet. Those will happen once the first big >> ("physname") series goes in. > Let's get the MI-reverse patch into 7.1. I don't care whether we do it before or after the branch, but this change has been sitting in the queue for a long time. AFAIK, the last patches were those dated in the neighborhood of 12/22/09?