Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?

Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 01/09/2010 12:16 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> This is with gcc SVN revision 155740, and src checked out yesterday
> (top of src/Changelog is the fix from Kaveh and FX for gcc PR42424).
>
> Not knowing a thing about libtool, I hope someone can tell me what's
> wrong here;-)

src and gcc's libtool are out-of-sync (2.2.6 vs. 2.2.7a respectively). 
Since gcc's files dominate, you have ltmain.sh from GCC but bfd's 
configure uses src's libtool configuration.

Binutils should adopt GCC's libtool.m4, ltmain.sh, lt~obsolete.m4, 
ltoptions.m4, ltsugar.m4, ltversion.m4 and src should rerun autoconf on 
all of its scripts (CCing gdb, newlib and cygwin mailing lists).

DJ, can you add these files to the list that we get email about?

Paolo

Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?

[H.J. Lu]

On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> wrote:
> On 01/09/2010 12:16 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>>
>> This is with gcc SVN revision 155740, and src checked out yesterday
>> (top of src/Changelog is the fix from Kaveh and FX for gcc PR42424).
>>
>> Not knowing a thing about libtool, I hope someone can tell me what's
>> wrong here;-)
>
> src and gcc's libtool are out-of-sync (2.2.6 vs. 2.2.7a respectively). Since
> gcc's files dominate, you have ltmain.sh from GCC but bfd's configure uses
> src's libtool configuration.
>
> Binutils should adopt GCC's libtool.m4, ltmain.sh, lt~obsolete.m4,
> ltoptions.m4, ltsugar.m4, ltversion.m4 and src should rerun autoconf on all
> of its scripts (CCing gdb, newlib and cygwin mailing lists).
>
> DJ, can you add these files to the list that we get email about?
>

Many files in the top directories between gcc and src are out of sync.
You can do a diff on them to check it out.

-- 
H.J.

Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 01/09/2010 04:48 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Paolo Bonzini<bonzini@gnu.org>  wrote:
>> On 01/09/2010 12:16 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>>>
>>> This is with gcc SVN revision 155740, and src checked out yesterday
>>> (top of src/Changelog is the fix from Kaveh and FX for gcc PR42424).
>>>
>>> Not knowing a thing about libtool, I hope someone can tell me what's
>>> wrong here;-)
>>
>> src and gcc's libtool are out-of-sync (2.2.6 vs. 2.2.7a respectively). Since
>> gcc's files dominate, you have ltmain.sh from GCC but bfd's configure uses
>> src's libtool configuration.
>>
>> Binutils should adopt GCC's libtool.m4, ltmain.sh, lt~obsolete.m4,
>> ltoptions.m4, ltsugar.m4, ltversion.m4 and src should rerun autoconf on all
>> of its scripts (CCing gdb, newlib and cygwin mailing lists).
>>
>> DJ, can you add these files to the list that we get email about?
>
> Many files in the top directories between gcc and src are out of sync.
> You can do a diff on them to check it out.

I know (as hinted above build maintainers get emails about out-of-sync 
email), but they do not break the build...

Paolo

Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 03:26:33PM CET:
> 
> Binutils should adopt GCC's libtool.m4, ltmain.sh, lt~obsolete.m4,
> ltoptions.m4, ltsugar.m4, ltversion.m4 and src should rerun autoconf
> on all of its scripts (CCing gdb, newlib and cygwin mailing lists).

I just pinged that very change this morning.  I will commit it later
tonight.

Cheers,
Ralf

Re: Combined tree fails to build -- libtool version mismatch?

[DJ Delorie]

> DJ, can you add these files to the list that we get email about?

Added: ltgcc.m4 ltmain.sh ltoptions.m4 ltsugar.m4 ltversion.m4 lt~obsolete.m4