Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re:next
@ 2009-07-03 12:45 nagaraju.m
  2009-07-07 10:40 ` Re:next Jeremy Bennett
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: nagaraju.m @ 2009-07-03 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb, jeremy.bennett

Hi Bennett,

	I am new new to gdb. Thanks for the useful information that you provided.
	I have tried as you suggested, i checked function prologue but it is defined properly.

	In my code "step", "stepi" and "continue" are behaving normally.
	
	"next" issue is not only with my target it is with simulator also.

	When i debugged it with gdb it is behaving correctly up to

	"*if(!frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (get_current_frame ()), step_frame_id)
     		&& frame_id_eq (frame_unwind_id (get_current_frame ()), step_frame_id))*"
    	this condition in infrun file in gdb. After this *start* and *end* points are changing as a result it is simply single stepping.

	I am not able to trace the issue for here...

	Can you please show me the path to resolve this issue...

Thanks,
Nagaraju M





on Thu, 2009-07-02 at 16:39 +0530, nagaraju.m wrote:

> > Hi all,
> > 
> >     I have ported gdb-6.8 to my target. But when i am debugging using 
> > new gdb i found that Next command is not working. Even i use next it is 
> > just single stepping...
> > 
> >     Can any one please help me out.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Nagaraju.M
>   

Hi Nagaraju,

I ran into the same problem with a port of GDB I did last year. From
memory, in that case, the problem was with my prologue analysis, giving
GDB some very strange information, which confused "next".

How do "step", "stepi" and "continue" behave for you?

If you are connecting to your target remotely, you can glean a lot of
information by looking at the Remote Serial Protocol (RSP) packet
exchanges. "next" may use some single instruction stepping if it thinks
it is currently in a function prologue or the middle of a high level
instruction, to get to the clean start of a high level instruction. It
will then set a breakpoint after that high level instruction and run to
that breakpoint. "next" could be failing if it can't single step, or it
can't get reliable information about the start of high level
instructions or end of function prologues, or if breakpoints aren't
working correctly.

I wrote an application note last year on RSP, which has some GDB client
function traces for various GDB commands. I didn't include "next", but
"step" and "continue" may help you.

        http://www.embecosm.com/download/ean4.html

Hope this is useful.


Jeremy

-- Tel: +44 (1590) 610184 Cell: +44 (7970) 676050 SkypeID: jeremybennett 
Email: jeremy.bennett@embecosm.com Web: www.embecosm.com



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* next
@ 2009-07-02 11:22 nagaraju.m
  2009-07-02 13:50 ` next Jeremy Bennett
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: nagaraju.m @ 2009-07-02 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb

Hi all,

    I have ported gdb-6.8 to my target. But when i am debugging using 
new gdb i found that Next command is not working. Even i use next it is 
just single stepping...

    Can any one please help me out.

Thanks in advance,
Nagaraju.M


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-07 15:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-03 12:45 nagaraju.m
2009-07-07 10:40 ` Re:next Jeremy Bennett
2009-07-07 11:53   ` next nagaraju.m
2009-07-07 15:19     ` next Jeremy Bennett
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-02 11:22 next nagaraju.m
2009-07-02 13:50 ` next Jeremy Bennett

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox