Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com,  vladimir@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: frame cache
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A648BC.8070105@eagercon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707241832.l6OIWAUp018805@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:35:59 -0700
>> From: Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com>
>>
>> When I put debugging code in <target>_analyze_prologue(), I see
>> that it is called over and over while executing a "next" command.
>> All those bits going back and forth over the serial line to the
>> target.
> 
> If that's the case, there's something wrong; prologue analysis should
> only be done as a last resort, i.e. when proper debug information is
> not available.
> 
> Your effort might be better spent on determining why proper debug info
> is not present instead of optimizing <target>_analyze_prologue().

Perhaps so, I don't see where other targets check for debug
info before calling analyze_prologue().  For example, on i386,
i386_analyze_prologue() is called each and every time that
i386_skip_prologue() is called.

I don't see where there is any test in symtab.c or infrun.c
which tests for debug info before calling SKIP_PROLOGUE which
calls <target>_skip_prologue.


-- 
Michael Eager	 eager@eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306  650-325-8077


  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-24 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-24 17:08 Michael Eager
2007-07-24 17:14 ` Michael Eager
2007-07-24 17:36   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-07-24 18:19     ` Michael Eager
2007-07-24 18:34       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-07-24 18:34       ` Mark Kettenis
2007-07-24 17:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-07-24 18:10   ` Michael Eager
2007-07-24 18:22     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-07-24 18:45       ` Michael Eager
2007-07-24 18:45     ` Mark Kettenis
2007-07-24 19:08       ` Michael Eager [this message]
2007-07-25  2:18         ` Paul Koning
2007-07-27  9:18         ` Wenbo Yang
2007-07-30 22:01           ` Michael Eager
2007-07-30 23:07             ` Mark Kettenis
2007-07-31  3:51             ` Wenbo Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46A648BC.8070105@eagercon.com \
    --to=eager@eagercon.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox