From: Maxim Grigoriev <maxim@tensilica.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>,
gdb@sourceware.org, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Subject: Re: Understanding GDB frames
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46546DD9.9070705@hq.tensilica.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070523022433.GA4942@caradoc.them.org>
> Why should we improve it this way?
I was answering abstract question how would I use "frame_id.special_addr" to improve frame ID analysis. I assumed it's been a theoretical discussion.
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 06:01:01PM -0700, Maxim Grigoriev wrote:
>
>> Anyway, doesn't it look like a reasonably inexpensive improvement ?
>>
>
> Why should we improve it this way?
>
> I haven't seen any compelling reason. Jim's already said that you
> can't rely on frame ID equality in all cases - this stuff is
> tricky to reason about, which is exactly why we try not to export the
> frame IDs to the MI client.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-23 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-21 22:24 Maxim Grigoriev
2007-05-21 23:28 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-22 2:05 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-22 2:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-22 2:51 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-22 10:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-22 8:40 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-22 16:10 ` Marc Gauthier
2007-05-22 16:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-22 18:14 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-05-22 18:33 ` Jim Ingham
2007-05-22 18:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-23 21:45 ` Jim Blandy
2007-05-22 17:20 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-22 20:24 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-22 21:12 ` Maxim Grigoriev
2007-05-22 1:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-05-22 2:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-22 18:37 ` Jim Blandy
2007-05-22 19:17 ` Maxim Grigoriev
2007-05-22 20:25 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-22 20:33 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-22 20:45 ` Maxim Grigoriev
2007-05-22 21:26 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-23 7:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-23 10:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-23 12:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-22 23:56 ` Jim Blandy
2007-05-23 1:01 ` Maxim Grigoriev
2007-05-23 2:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-23 16:37 ` Maxim Grigoriev [this message]
2007-05-23 0:05 ` Jim Blandy
2007-05-23 0:17 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-23 0:32 ` Jim Blandy
2007-05-23 2:24 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-23 21:52 ` Jim Blandy
2007-05-24 0:05 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-24 1:24 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-24 21:56 ` Jim Blandy
2007-05-23 0:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46546DD9.9070705@hq.tensilica.com \
--to=maxim@tensilica.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=jimb@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox