From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Maxim Grigoriev <maxim@tensilica.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>,
Pete MacLiesh <pmac@tensilica.com>,
Ross Morley <ross@tensilica.com>
Subject: Re: Understanding GDB frames
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 01:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070522014044.GC3627@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46521C04.7040405@hq.tensilica.com>
If my understanding of the frame code is correct, then the only
thing that is really guaranteed is that the frame ID remains
constant throughout the lifetime of its associated frame, or
function call. The rest is implementation-dependent.
In practice, I think most targets implement the frame ID as a tuple
that contains one stack address (usually the address on the stack
of the function frame), and one code address (usually the address
of the first instruction for that function). So two consecutive
calls to the same function from the same caller would usually
result in the same frame ID being computed for these two calls.
But this is not guaranteed, for instance if the compiler elected
to adjust the stack for whatever reason between the two function
calls.
IA64 is slighly more complicated, because it also has to take
into account the fact that it has a register stack. So the frame
ID tuple also includes a non-zero "special addr".
Hope this helps. Others will correct me if I'm wrong.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-22 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-21 22:24 Maxim Grigoriev
2007-05-21 23:28 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-22 2:05 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-22 2:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-22 2:51 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-22 10:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-22 8:40 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-22 16:10 ` Marc Gauthier
2007-05-22 16:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-22 18:14 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-05-22 18:33 ` Jim Ingham
2007-05-22 18:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-23 21:45 ` Jim Blandy
2007-05-22 17:20 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-22 20:24 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-22 21:12 ` Maxim Grigoriev
2007-05-22 1:40 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2007-05-22 2:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-22 18:37 ` Jim Blandy
2007-05-22 19:17 ` Maxim Grigoriev
2007-05-22 20:25 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-22 20:33 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-22 20:45 ` Maxim Grigoriev
2007-05-22 21:26 ` Nick Roberts
2007-05-23 7:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-23 10:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-23 12:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-05-22 23:56 ` Jim Blandy
2007-05-23 1:01 ` Maxim Grigoriev
2007-05-23 2:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-23 16:37 ` Maxim Grigoriev
2007-05-23 0:05 ` Jim Blandy
2007-05-23 0:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-23 0:17 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-23 0:32 ` Jim Blandy
2007-05-23 2:24 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-23 21:52 ` Jim Blandy
2007-05-24 0:05 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-24 1:24 ` Ross Morley
2007-05-24 21:56 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070522014044.GC3627@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=marc@tensilica.com \
--cc=maxim@tensilica.com \
--cc=pmac@tensilica.com \
--cc=ross@tensilica.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox