* GDB 6.2
@ 2004-06-29 15:33 Andrew Cagney
2004-06-29 15:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-06-29 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb, Jim Blandy, Daniel Jacobowitz
Michael wrote:
> native i686-pc-linux-gnu has two regressions from gdb 6.1 to gdb HEAD.
>
> gdb/1650 manythreads.exp
> gdb/1677 [regression] selftest.exp, crash in lookup_symtab
>
> 1677 is probably easy to fix. 1650 looks significantly deeper.
> The problem with 1650 is that gdb HEAD randomly gets internal errors,
> but gdb 6.1 does not, on the same test script.
I suspect that these are both fixed?
Jim, Daniel, where do we stand with the ICU code?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 6.2
2004-06-29 15:33 GDB 6.2 Andrew Cagney
@ 2004-06-29 15:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-06-29 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb, Jim Blandy
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:30:19AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> >native i686-pc-linux-gnu has two regressions from gdb 6.1 to gdb HEAD.
> >
> > gdb/1650 manythreads.exp
> > gdb/1677 [regression] selftest.exp, crash in lookup_symtab
> >
> >1677 is probably easy to fix. 1650 looks significantly deeper.
> >The problem with 1650 is that gdb HEAD randomly gets internal errors,
> >but gdb 6.1 does not, on the same test script.
>
> I suspect that these are both fixed?
1677 is fixed by Bob's patch (not sure if he's checked it in yet). I
have no reason to think that manythreads.exp is fixed, though. I
haven't had time to look at it yet. It's an intermittent failure; it
doesn't seem to show up running the testsuite without load. For me at
least.
> Jim, Daniel, where do we stand with the ICU code?
There are about four patches left, fairly large. Last ping was two
weeks ago.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 6.2
@ 2004-06-30 10:06 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2004-06-30 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cagney, drow; +Cc: gdb, jimb
drow> 1677 is fixed by Bob's patch (not sure if he's checked it in yet).
drow> I have no reason to think that manythreads.exp is fixed, though.
Daniel's right, as usual.
Also there are some hppa-hpux regressions. I've filed only one PR so
far, gdb/1692. Jeff J updated the code in bpstat_stop_status so I have
to run another spin. It might be fixed. It might not.
That's all the things I know about:
1650 manythreads, waiting for investigation (daniel j)
1677 symtab fullname, waiting for patch commit + retest (michael c)
1692 hpux watchpoint, waiting for retest (michael c)
about 15 more unanalyzed hppa-hpux testsuite regressions (michael c)
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-06-29 17:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-06-29 15:33 GDB 6.2 Andrew Cagney
2004-06-29 15:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-30 10:06 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox