From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Always pass target to ADD_SOLIB?
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 02:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FB98B2A.6010609@redhat.com> (raw)
Hello,
Can anyone think of a reason why infrun.c doesn't pass the [exec] target
vector to SOLIB_ADD. That way the target can have its section table
updated (allowing for bugs)? I'm finding that the section table doesn't
include shared libraries and, hence, have no robust way of doing
per-target address->section lookups.
Andrew
next reply other threads:[~2003-11-18 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-18 2:59 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-11-22 4:32 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FB98B2A.6010609@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox