From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18333 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2003 02:59:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18326 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2003 02:59:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (65.49.0.121) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 2003 02:59:57 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CEB2B8F for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:59:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FB98B2A.6010609@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 02:59:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Always pass target to ADD_SOLIB? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 Hello, Can anyone think of a reason why infrun.c doesn't pass the [exec] target vector to SOLIB_ADD. That way the target can have its section table updated (allowing for bugs)? I'm finding that the section table doesn't include shared libraries and, hence, have no robust way of doing per-target address->section lookups. Andrew